Star Connectors vs Good Karma: Which Geodesic Dome System is Better? — Viking Dome
Salta il contenuto
Star Connectors vs Good Karma: Which Geodesic Dome System is Better?

Star Connectors vs Good Karma: Which Geodesic Dome System is Better?

 

Star Connectors vs Good Karma: Which Geodesic Dome System Is Better?

·

Good Karma: What You Really Get with Open‑Source

The Good Karma geodesic dome is open‑source. Free calculators generate the frame drawings in your chosen size and provide triangle layouts. Beyond that, door/window details, façade build‑ups, and structural connections must be sourced independently—from companies or community posts. Every solution must be checked and adapted for your climate zone: waterproofing and insulation differ in southern vs northern regions; materials and dimensions change with local snow loads and wind loads. A dome that looks perfect in Spain can underperform in Northern Europe due to temperature cycles and loads.

Star Connectors by VikingDome: Permit‑Ready and Engineered

Star Connectors include professional structural options and documentation. In many countries, building permits require static calculations. If the supplied documentation isn’t enough for your municipality, loads can be calculated individually for your dome data. Star domes can reach up to 20 m diameter and achieve snow loads up to 3.3 kN/m², suitable for cold and warm climates.

Wood, Cutting Time & Logistics: 6 m Dome (V3 4/7, 120×40 mm)

Good Karma

  • 362 linear meters (≈ 1.67 m³ of timber)
  • 315 pieces cut from 3–6 m stock in 9 lengths; ends cut at multiple angles
  • Triangle assembly with screws requires pre‑drilling (end‑grain is prone to splitting)
  • Assembled triangles are bulky—e.g., an 11 m Icosahedron can occupy 6 oversized Euro‑pallets

Star Connectors

  • 185 linear meters (≈ 0.84 m³ of timber)
  • 165 pieces in 7 lengths; all cuts at 90° (fast and repeatable)
  • Compact logistics—typically 1–2 pallets depending on timber section
Metric Good Karma Star Connectors
Timber (linear meters) 362 185
Timber volume (m³) 1.67 0.84
Piece count / lengths 315 / 9 165 / 7
Cutting angle Variable (multiple angles) 90° (straight cuts)
Assembly time 4–5× more than Star Baseline
Logistics Up to 6 oversized pallets 1–2 pallets

Why Good Karma Joints Are Structurally Weaker

Good Karma triangles are screwed into the end grain—the screw threads run along the fibers. This is known as end‑grain screwing and provides only about 30–40% of the withdrawal strength of a proper side‑grain connection. Geodesic domes experience high tensile forces; end‑grain joints can’t provide reliable tension capacity.

Side‑grain (baseline 100%) vs end‑grain (~30–40%) screw withdrawal.

Example: Ø6 mm screw, 40 mm embedment

  • Side grain: ~1.2–1.5 kN
  • End grain: ~0.4–0.6 kN

Ventilation & Moisture: Open Nodes vs Closed Triangles

Closed triangle frames trap air inside, creating pockets where condensation can occur, leading to unpleasant odors or mold. Star connectors leave small gaps between timber under the steel nodes, creating micro‑ventilation suitable for insulated and non‑insulated coverings. When planning roof/façade layers, provide air intake and exhaust paths for the frame.

Timber Options

Star frames can be built with pine, spruce, birch, ash, oak, larch, or other timber species.

Conclusion: Which System Should You Choose?

Good Karma suits small domes in regions with low snow and wind loads. For larger, stronger, and more climate‑ready domes, Star Connectors deliver superior structural strength, faster cutting and assembly, better logistics, and improved ventilation.


Articolo successivo Beyond Glamping: 7 Creative and Unconventional Uses for Geodesic Domes

Confronta Prodotti

{"one"=>"Seleziona 2 o 3 articoli da confrontare", "other"=>"{{ count }} di 3 elementi selezionati"}

Seleziona il primo elemento da confrontare

Seleziona il secondo elemento da confrontare

Seleziona il terzo elemento da confrontare

Confrontare